Use case : Sector Industry
Ekara
by ip-label
User Experience KPIs & XLA:
measure what users really feel
Move beyond “green SLAs”. Build a user-centric measurement system (XLAs) that connects performance, reliability and friction to business outcomes — with a clear governance model.
Outcome
Shared truth across IT & Business
Method
Scenario-based + perception score
Focus
Friction, speed, availability
Experience signal map
From “user journeys” → to measurable KPIs → to a business-ready XLA score.
User Experience KPIs: the missing layer between IT and reality
In complex environments (legacy + SaaS + hybrid networks), “availability” does not automatically mean “good experience”. Users can face slow login, broken steps, long API waits, or inconsistent flows — while your dashboards remain green.
The goal of XLAs (Experience Level Agreements) is to define and track experience outcomes that business stakeholders understand: speed, success, friction and confidence across key digital journeys.
Measure
What matters
Critical journeys, not generic uptime.
Explain
Why it hurts
Friction signals linked to root causes.
Improve
What to do next
Prioritization based on user impact.
Why traditional SLAs fail (even when they’re “green”)
SLAs are often infrastructure-centric: response time averages, availability windows, packet loss thresholds. But users experience journeys made of multiple steps — front-end, identity, APIs, third-party services.
- ✓ Averages hide pain: one slow step can ruin the whole journey.
- ✓ “Up” ≠ usable: authentication loops, timeouts, broken forms.
- ✓ No shared language: IT sees metrics; business hears complaints.
XLAs complement SLAs by defining “what good feels like” for the user — and by tracking it consistently across sites, devices, networks and application versions.
Typical symptoms
“Users say it’s slow, but monitoring says OK.”
You lack a journey-based perception metric.
War rooms without evidence.
No objective scoring to prioritize what matters.
Endless debates: network vs app vs vendor.
No shared reference aligned to user impact.
The Ekara XLA framework
A practical approach to build an executive-ready XLA model: choose journeys, define KPIs, compute a score, and operationalize it with governance and continuous improvement loops.
Step 1
Select critical journeys
Login, search, checkout, claim submission, CRM tasks, etc.
Step 2
Define KPI signals
Speed, success rate, latency distribution, friction events.
Step 3
Set targets & thresholds
Per persona, device, site, region, and time period.
Best practice
Use a mix of synthetic journeys (always-on controlled tests) and real user signals (actual field experience) to avoid blind spots.
UX KPI library (practical examples)
Below are KPI families commonly used to quantify user experience. The best model combines speed + reliability + friction + consistency across critical steps.
Speed
Time-to-Value & step duration
- Page / screen load (P75 / P95)
- API response time (per endpoint criticality)
- Login duration (incl. MFA)
Reliability
Success rate & error budget
- Journey completion rate
- Error rate per step (4xx/5xx, crashes)
- Availability of critical functions (not only hosts)
Friction
Irritants users actually feel
- Rage clicks / repeated actions
- Form abandon rate, validation errors
- UI freezes, long tasks, timeouts
Consistency
Variance across contexts
- Regional/site performance gap
- Device/OS/browser differences
- Release impact (before/after versions)
Pro tip: build “journey scorecards”
For each journey, publish a simple scorecard: score, top degradations, where (site/region/device), why (likely layer), and next actions.
How to deploy XLAs (a realistic roadmap)
A successful XLA program is incremental: start with a few journeys, validate the score model, and scale with governance.
Phase 1 (2–4 weeks)
Baseline & selection
Pick 3–5 critical journeys, define personas, map dependencies and peak periods.
Phase 2 (4–8 weeks)
Score model & dashboard
Set KPI thresholds, weights, segments, and publish an executive-ready XLA view.
Phase 3 (ongoing)
Operationalize improvement
Run XLA rituals, prioritize irritants, validate fixes with before/after evidence.
What teams usually love
- Less debate, more evidence
- Priorities tied to business impact
- Clear narrative for exec committees
What to avoid
- Too many KPIs without decisions
- Scoring that hides segments (site/device)
- No ownership for thresholds & exceptions
Results with Ekara XLA
In a large industrial environment (multi-site, legacy + SaaS), the XLA approach helped teams quantify experience, identify bottlenecks, and align priorities across technical domains.
performance gain on critical applications
faster prioritization with user impact evidence
reduction of recurring “experience” incidents
more clarity in IT-to-business reporting
The key shift: instead of arguing about technical indicators, teams used XLA evidence to answer “what users feel” and “what to fix first” — with measurable before/after validation.
FAQ
Quick answers to common questions when launching an XLA program.
How many journeys should we start with?
Do XLAs replace SLAs?
What makes an XLA score trusted by executives?
How do we avoid “too many KPIs”?
Want to build your XLA model?
Our experts help you define journeys, KPI scorecards and governance — and turn experience data into a clear plan to improve application quality and business satisfaction.